So slowly and carefully he chose every time little easier first question than last time. However, it seemed like that making of the first question easier was useless, as there was every time almost an equal number of wrong answers.

Finally he got fed up with the whole experiment of his and decided to end it once and for all. In the next test he put the first question as follows:

*How much do we get if we add 1 to 1?*Surprisingly not everyone were able to get even this right. Some of the students thought it was a riddle and answered something else than

*two*.

Anyway, I think it's not too rare that students face a question that isn't completely unambiguous or clear, and the students are forced to make a "sophisticated guess" about the interpretation of the problem. I have here a test question from my probability course (maybe 6 years ago) where I had a little problem:

**Question:**Five persons are going to be elected in a committee. There are eight candidates for the committee, 5 women and 3 men. What is the probability that the

*minority*of the committee will be men, if five persons from eight are chosen by random?

Okay, at first let's think about all the possible combinations for the committee:

{f, f, f, f, f} = A

{f, f, f, f, m} = B

{f, f, f, m, m} = C

{f, f, m, m, m} = D, where f=female, m=male.

**The problem is basically this**: are men the minority in the set A even thought there's no men?

This is one of the first definitions for minority I found:

*Minority - the smaller in number of two groups forming a whole.*

Some might think that the minority in A is an empty set, others that the minority doesn't exist in A. I think it doesn't actually matter, as there's anyway no such a subset of A that would contain a male as an element. So males can't be the minority in the set A.

The right interpretation according to my math teacher was that the sets A, B and C were cases where men were the minority. Fortunately enough I had let all my pedantic pride go in the test and answered interpreting A as a minority set like the teacher meant.

I guess the moral of the story is to save your clever remarks for your blog.